SRS vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $15M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.49% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -18.76% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.70% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -14.20% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.49% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 40.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SRS vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRS returned -16.70% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, SRS is down 18.76% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, SRS compounded at -14.20% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -5.49% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs -28.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SRS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.72. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRS charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRS currently yields 3.49% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SRS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRS or VOO?
SRS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRS or VOO?
Over the past year SRS returned -16.70% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRS annualized -28.65% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRS or VOO?
SRS has been the more volatile fund at 40.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRS -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRS and VOO?
SRS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRS and VOO?
SRS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRS or VOO?
SRS yields 3.49% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.