SRS vs VOO
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, SRS or VOO?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.72, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRS | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $15M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.48% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 8 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -12.30% | +12.25%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.51% | +17.03%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -13.32% | +21.25%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.75% | +13.08%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.0% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -98.0% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,260 | $18,490Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 17, 2026 (16 years).
SRS vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
SRS vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraShort Real Estate (SRS) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRS returned -6.51% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, SRS is down 12.30% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, SRS compounded at -13.32% per year against +21.25% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -3.75% and +13.08% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.38% annualized vs -20.98%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -98.0% for SRS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.72. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRS charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRS currently yields 3.48% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SRS and 494 in VOO, totalling 83.1% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SRS and 494 in VOO, against full books of 8 and 509.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SRS and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRS or VOO?
SRS has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SRS or VOO?
Over the past year SRS returned -6.51% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRS annualized -20.98% vs +13.38% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SRS or VOO?
SRS has been the more volatile fund at 31.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRS -98.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRS and VOO?
SRS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.72, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRS or VOO?
SRS yields 3.48% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SRS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than SRS?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.72, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.