SCHD vs TEMT
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TEMT?
Large Cap Value against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TEMT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 1.31% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $36M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 46.88% |
| Holdings | 103 | 6 |
| YTD Return | +24.23% | +200.47%Best |
| 1Y Return | +27.90%Best | +5.99% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.55% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.97% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5%Best | 165.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -4.6%Best | -84.0% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,346Best | $12,598 |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | May 12, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 13, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.3 years).
SCHD vs TEMT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
SCHD vs TEMT Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Tradr 2X Long TEM Daily ETF (TEMT) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% while TEMT returned +5.99%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.23% versus a gain of 200.47% for TEMT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TEMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 165.5% compared with 12.5% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.6% for SCHD and -84.0% for TEMT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TEMT charges 1.31%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $131 annually, a gap of $125 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 46.88% for TEMT.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TEMT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TEMT?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TEMT charges 1.31%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $125 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SCHD or TEMT?
Over the past year SCHD returned +27.90% vs +5.99% for TEMT, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SCHD annualized +24.86% vs +19.44% for TEMT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SCHD or TEMT?
TEMT has been the more volatile fund at 165.5% annualized versus 12.5% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -4.6% vs TEMT -84.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and TEMT?
SCHD and TEMT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TEMT?
SCHD yields 3.00% while TEMT yields 46.88%, so TEMT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TEMT better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.