SCHD vs TLIE
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs American Beacon The London Company Income Equity ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TLIE?
SCHD costs less.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TLIE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.67% |
| AUM | $111.6B | - |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 206 | 31 |
| YTD Return | +26.51%Best | +2.17% |
| 1Y Return | +31.31% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.66% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.6%Best | 46.2% |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | American Beacon Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Sep 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TLIE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TLIE Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and American Beacon The London Company Income Equity ETF (TLIE) is an ETF from American Beacon Funds. Year to date, SCHD is up 26.51% versus a gain of 2.17% for TLIE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TLIE charges 0.67%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $67 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.24% against 0.00% for TLIE.
Holdings Overlap
18.8% of SCHD's money is in holdings TLIE also owns. 20.5% of TLIE's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
TLIE and SCHD share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 31 in TLIE, against full books of 206 and 31.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 98 and 31 positions we hold weights for.
SCHD holds 90 positions TLIE does not, 80.9% of the fund.
Largest: QCOM 4.61%, PG 4.16%, KO 4.12%, MRK 4.04%, COP 3.91%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SCHD | Weight in TLIE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 4.89% | 4.48% | 0.41% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 4.14% | 4.13% | 0.01% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 3.95% | 2.71% | 1.24% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 2.89% | 2.40% | 0.49% |
| FASTFastenal Co. | 1.50% | 2.89% | 1.39% |
| CINFCincinnati Financial Corp. | 0.64% | 2.15% | 1.51% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 0.81% | 1.76% | 0.95% |
20.5% of TLIE is already inside SCHD.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TLIE?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TLIE charges 0.67%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TLIE?
20.5% of TLIE's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 20.5% of TLIE's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 98 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 31 in TLIE.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TLIE?
SCHD yields 3.24% while TLIE yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TLIE better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.