SCHD vs TSNF
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF
Which is better, SCHD or TSNF?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TSNF is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TSNF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $112.1B | $8M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 103 | 150 |
| YTD Return | +24.04%Best | +18.92% |
| 1Y Return | +27.95% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.51% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.80% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8% | 11.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Truth Social Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Dec 30, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
SCHD vs TSNF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SCHD vs TSNF Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Truth Social American Next Frontiers ETF (TSNF) is an ETF from Truth Social Funds. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.04% versus a gain of 18.92% for TSNF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TSNF charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $65 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.00% against 0.00% for TSNF.
Holdings Overlap
5.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings TSNF also owns. 2.0% of TSNF's money is in holdings SCHD also owns.
SCHD and TSNF share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 147 in TSNF, against full books of 103 and 150.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 143 positions for TSNF that do not appear in our book for SCHD (97.5% of the fund), and 96 for SCHD that do not appear in TSNF (94.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SCHD and TSNF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TSNF?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TSNF charges 0.65%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TSNF?
5.9% of SCHD's money is in holdings TSNF also owns. 2.0% of TSNF's is in holdings SCHD also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in SCHD and 147 in TSNF.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TSNF?
SCHD yields 3.00% while TSNF yields 0.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSNF better than SCHD?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. TSNF is less concentrated, with 11.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.