SCHD vs TWM
SCHD vs TWM
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TWM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $44M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 5.68% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +24.26% | -33.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.38% | -48.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.08% | -58.58% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.72% | -41.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 43.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | Jan 23, 2007 |
SCHD vs TWM Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% while TWM returned -48.45%. Year to date, SCHD is up 24.26% versus a loss of 33.17% for TWM.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +15.08% per year against -58.58% for TWM; over five years the annualized figures are +9.72% and -41.59% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs -35.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.0% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -100.0% for TWM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.70. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TWM charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $95 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 5.68% for TWM.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and TWM share 0 holdings out of 101 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TWM?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TWM charges 0.95%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $89 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or TWM?
Over the past year SCHD returned +31.38% vs -48.45% for TWM, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SCHD annualized +11.39% vs -35.17% for TWM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or TWM?
TWM has been the more volatile fund at 43.0% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs TWM -100.0%.
Should I hold both SCHD and TWM?
SCHD and TWM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TWM?
SCHD and TWM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 101 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TWM?
SCHD yields 3.31% while TWM yields 5.68%, so TWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.