TWM vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TWM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -31.42% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -44.41% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -59.55% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -41.93% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 43.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 23, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
TWM vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TWM returned -44.41% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, TWM is down 31.42% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, TWM compounded at -59.55% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -41.93% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -35.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TWM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 43.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for TWM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.83. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TWM charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TWM currently yields 5.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TWM and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TWM or VTI?
TWM has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TWM or VTI?
Over the past year TWM returned -44.41% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), TWM annualized -35.04% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TWM or VTI?
TWM has been the more volatile fund at 43.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TWM -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TWM and VTI?
TWM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TWM and VTI?
TWM and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TWM or VTI?
TWM yields 5.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TWM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.