URA vs VOO
Global X Uranium ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. URA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URA | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.69% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.3B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.30% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 57 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +0.02% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.83% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.32% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +24.52% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -93.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
URA vs VOO Performance
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URA returned +29.83% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, URA is up 0.02% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, URA compounded at +31.32% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +24.52% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -2.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -93.5% for URA and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URA charges 0.69% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $69 vs $3 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URA currently yields 5.30% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
URA and VOO share 0 holdings out of 550 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URA or VOO?
URA has an expense ratio of 0.69% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.
Which performed better, URA or VOO?
Over the past year URA returned +29.83% vs +21.87% for VOO, so URA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), URA annualized -2.32% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, URA or VOO?
URA has been the more volatile fund at 37.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: URA -93.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both URA and VOO?
URA and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between URA and VOO?
URA and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 550 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, URA or VOO?
URA yields 5.30% while VOO yields 1.08%, so URA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.