SCO vs VTI
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $772M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -66.29% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -63.22% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -29.88% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -41.24% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 114.5% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.7% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
SCO vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCO returned -63.22% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, SCO is down 66.29% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, SCO compounded at -29.88% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -41.24% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -19.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 114.5% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.7% for SCO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCO charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCO currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SCO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCO or VTI?
SCO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCO or VTI?
Over the past year SCO returned -63.22% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), SCO annualized -19.09% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCO or VTI?
SCO has been the more volatile fund at 114.5% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SCO -99.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SCO and VTI?
SCO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCO and VTI?
SCO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCO or VTI?
SCO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.