SCO vs VXUS
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCO | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $759M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -71.39% | +13.91% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.21% | +25.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -31.47% | +19.76% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -42.65% | +8.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 114.3% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2008 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SCO vs VXUS Performance
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude Oil (SCO) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SCO returned -65.21% while VXUS returned +25.90%. Year to date, SCO is down 71.39% versus a gain of 13.91% for VXUS.
Over three years, SCO compounded at -31.47% per year against +19.76% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -42.65% and +8.82% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.80% annualized vs -19.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 114.3% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.8% for SCO and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCO charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCO currently yields 0.00% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SCO and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 8095 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCO or VXUS?
SCO has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCO or VXUS?
Over the past year SCO returned -65.21% vs +25.90% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SCO annualized -19.78% vs +4.80% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCO or VXUS?
SCO has been the more volatile fund at 114.3% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SCO -99.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SCO and VXUS?
SCO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCO and VXUS?
SCO and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8095 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCO or VXUS?
SCO yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.