SGDM vs VTI
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SGDM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SGDM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $653M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +23.32% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +71.26% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +54.86% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +27.44% | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.8% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
SGDM vs VTI Performance
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is a ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SGDM returned +71.26% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SGDM is up 23.32% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SGDM compounded at +54.86% per year against +21.83% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +27.44% and +12.01% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, SGDM has the edge at +11.79% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.8% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.0% for SGDM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SGDM charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SGDM currently yields 1.18% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SGDM or VTI?
Over the past year SGDM returned +71.26% vs +22.35% for VTI, so SGDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SGDM annualized +11.79% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM has been the more volatile fund at 38.8% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SGDM -55.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SGDM and VTI?
SGDM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SGDM and VTI?
SGDM and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2834 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM yields 1.18% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SGDM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.