SGDM vs VTI
Sprott Gold Miners ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SGDM or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SGDM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SGDM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $663M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.89% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +5.73% | +14.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +16.36%Best | +16.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +49.70%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +25.40%Best | +12.76% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.2% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -55.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $31,009Best | $18,230 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Sprott ETFS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2014 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 15, 2014 to Oct 5, 2026 (12.2 years).
SGDM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.2 years both funds cover.
SGDM vs VTI Performance
Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) is an ETF from Sprott ETFS and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SGDM returned +16.36% while VTI returned +16.22%. Year to date, SGDM is up 5.73% versus a gain of 14.14% for VTI.
Over three years, SGDM compounded at +49.70% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +25.40% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.10% annualized vs +10.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SGDM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.2% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.0% for SGDM and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SGDM charges 0.46% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $3 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SGDM currently yields 0.89% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
11.6% of SGDM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's money is in holdings SGDM also owns.
SGDM and VTI share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in SGDM and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,147 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SGDM (97.3% of the fund), and 4 for SGDM that do not appear in VTI (6.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SGDM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SGDM or VTI?
Over the past year SGDM returned +16.36% vs +16.22% for VTI, so SGDM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), SGDM annualized +10.26% vs +12.10% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM has been the more volatile fund at 38.2% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SGDM -55.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SGDM and VTI?
SGDM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SGDM and VTI?
11.6% of SGDM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.2% of VTI's is in holdings SGDM also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 49 positions we hold weights for in SGDM and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SGDM or VTI?
SGDM yields 0.89% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SGDM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SGDM led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.