SIJ vs VOO

SIJ vs VOO

Which is better, SIJ or VOO?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.89, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSIJVOO
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$997.4B
Dividend Yield4.54%1.04%
Holdings5509
YTD Return-13.49%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-19.70%+15.60%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-27.06%+20.82%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-17.75%+12.60%Best
Volatility (annualized)32.2%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown--34.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$3,764$18,101Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJan 30, 2007Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16 years).

SIJ vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

SIJ vs VOO Performance

ProShares UltraShort Industrials (SIJ) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SIJ returned -19.70% while VOO returned +15.60%. Year to date, SIJ is down 13.49% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Over three years, SIJ compounded at -27.06% per year against +20.82% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -17.75% and +12.60% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.30% annualized vs -28.70%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SIJ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.89. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SIJ charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SIJ currently yields 4.54% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SIJ and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SIJVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SIJ or VOO?

SIJ has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SIJ or VOO?

Over the past year SIJ returned -19.70% vs +15.60% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SIJ annualized -28.70% vs +13.30% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SIJ or VOO?

SIJ has been the more volatile fund at 32.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO.

Should I hold both SIJ and VOO?

SIJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.89, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SIJ or VOO?

SIJ yields 4.54% while VOO yields 1.04%, so SIJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than SIJ?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.89, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.