SLDR vs VTI
Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SLDR or VTI?
Short Term Government Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLDR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $38M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.67% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 89 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +0.59% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.75% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.0%Best | 13.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -0.9%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $10,514 | $14,180Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Government Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 10, 2024 to Sep 18, 2026 (2 years).
SLDR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
SLDR vs VTI Performance
Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF (SLDR) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLDR returned +1.75% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, SLDR is up 0.59% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 1.0% for SLDR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.9% for SLDR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLDR charges 0.12% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $3 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLDR currently yields 3.67% against 1.03% for VTI.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLDR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLDR or VTI?
SLDR has an expense ratio of 0.12% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $9 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLDR or VTI?
Over the past year SLDR returned +1.75% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SLDR annualized +2.54% vs +19.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SLDR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 1.0% for SLDR. Worst drawdown: SLDR -0.9% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SLDR and VTI?
SLDR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLDR or VTI?
SLDR yields 3.67% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SLDR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SLDR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.