SLVY vs VTI
FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 0 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +9.50% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.50% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 52.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
SLVY vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF (SLVY) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVY returned +9.50% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, SLVY is up 9.50% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 52.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.2% for SLVY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVY charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVY currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLVY or VTI?
Over the past year SLVY returned +9.50% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVY annualized -4.94% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY has been the more volatile fund at 52.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLVY -64.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLVY and VTI?
SLVY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVY or VTI?
SLVY yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.