QQQ vs SLVY

QQQ vs SLVY

Which is better, QQQ or SLVY?

Large Cap Growth against Commodities.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: QQQHigher Returns: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQQQSLVY
Expense Ratio0.18%Best0.85%
AUM$483.5B$1M
Dividend Yield0.44%0.51%
Holdings10716
YTD Return+15.86%Best+4.85%
1Y Return+22.63%Best+4.85%
3Y Return (annualized)+24.15%-
5Y Return (annualized)+14.16%-
Volatility (annualized)17.5%Best51.3%
Max Drawdown-35.1%Best-64.2%
$10,000 over 15.3 years$127,640Best$4,425
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityCommodity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthCommodities
InceptionMar 10, 1999Jul 8, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 15.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 27, 2011 to Sep 10, 2026 (15.3 years).

QQQ vs SLVY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

QQQ vs SLVY Performance

Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and FT Vest Silver Strategy & Target Income ETF (SLVY) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% while SLVY returned +4.85%. Year to date, QQQ is up 15.86% versus a gain of 4.85% for SLVY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SLVY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.3% compared with 17.5% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.1% for QQQ and -64.2% for SLVY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SLVY charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $85 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.51% for SLVY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of QQQ and SLVY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

QQQSLVY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QQQ or SLVY?

QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SLVY charges 0.85%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, QQQ or SLVY?

Over the past year QQQ returned +22.63% vs +4.85% for SLVY, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), QQQ annualized +18.11% vs -5.19% for SLVY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, QQQ or SLVY?

SLVY has been the more volatile fund at 51.3% annualized versus 17.5% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: QQQ -35.1% vs SLVY -64.2%.

Should I hold both QQQ and SLVY?

QQQ and SLVY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SLVY?

QQQ yields 0.44% while SLVY yields 0.51%, so SLVY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SLVY better than QQQ?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.