SMIG vs VOO
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMIG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.5B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.80% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.73% | +13.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.21% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.03% | +22.16% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Advisors Asset Management, Inc. | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 25, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SMIG vs VOO Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Small/Mid Cap Income Growth ETF (SMIG) is a ETF from Advisors Asset Management, Inc. and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMIG returned +13.21% while VOO returned +21.62%. Year to date, SMIG is up 14.73% versus a gain of 13.20% for VOO.
Over three years, SMIG compounded at +14.03% per year against +22.16% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.78% and +13.42% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.51% annualized vs +7.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SMIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for SMIG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMIG charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMIG currently yields 1.80% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SMIG and VOO share 13 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMIG or VOO?
SMIG has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SMIG or VOO?
Over the past year SMIG returned +13.21% vs +21.62% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), SMIG annualized +7.78% vs +13.51% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SMIG or VOO?
SMIG has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SMIG -19.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SMIG and VOO?
SMIG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SMIG and VOO?
SMIG and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMIG or VOO?
SMIG yields 1.80% while VOO yields 1.08%, so SMIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.