SPDW vs VBK
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, SPDW or VBK?
Large Cap Blend against Small Cap Growth.
SPDW has a lower expense ratio. SPDW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VBK over the full window. VBK is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPDW | VBK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.05% |
| AUM | $41.1B | $23.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.92% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 2,440 | 545 |
| YTD Return | +12.16%Best | +11.37% |
| 1Y Return | +20.14%Best | +13.42% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.46%Best | +18.47% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.69%Best | +4.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.5%Best | 20.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.2% | -59.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,879Best | $12,468 |
| Top 10 Weight | 12.6% | 9.9%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Small Cap Growth |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2007 | Jan 26, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 26, 2007 to Oct 12, 2026 (19.5 years).
SPDW vs VBK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.
SPDW vs VBK Performance
State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPDW returned +20.14% while VBK returned +13.42%. Year to date, SPDW is up 12.16% versus a gain of 11.37% for VBK.
Over three years, SPDW compounded at +20.46% per year against +18.47% for VBK; over five years the annualized figures are +9.69% and +4.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VBK has the edge at +8.47% annualized vs +2.93%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VBK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.3% compared with 17.5% for SPDW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.2% for SPDW and -59.4% for VBK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPDW charges 0.03% per year while VBK charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $5 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPDW currently yields 2.92% against 0.44% for VBK.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of SPDW's money is in holdings VBK also owns. 1.1% of VBK's money is in holdings SPDW also owns.
VBK and SPDW share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 2,395 positions we hold weights for in SPDW and 532 in VBK, against full books of 2,440 and 545.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 510 positions for VBK that do not appear in our book for SPDW (93.2% of the fund), and 53 for SPDW that do not appear in VBK (6.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SPDW | Weight in VBK | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQTEQT Corp. | 0.05% | 0.25% | 0.20% |
| HLHecla Mining Co | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
| FROGJfrog Ltd | 0.03% | 0.25% | 0.22% |
| BILLBill.Com Holdings, Inc. Common Stock | 0.01% | 0.12% | 0.11% |
| KNSA:LNKiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. | 0.01% | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| SYMSymbotic Inc Class A | 0.02% | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| EFR:CAEnergy Fuels Inc | 0.01% | 0.04% | 0.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SPDW and VBK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPDW or VBK?
SPDW has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VBK charges 0.05%. SPDW is the cheaper option, by $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPDW or VBK?
Over the past year SPDW returned +20.14% vs +13.42% for VBK, so SPDW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SPDW annualized +2.93% vs +8.47% for VBK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPDW or VBK?
VBK has been the more volatile fund at 20.3% annualized versus 17.5% for SPDW. Worst drawdown: SPDW -62.2% vs VBK -59.4%.
Should I hold both SPDW and VBK?
SPDW and VBK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SPDW and VBK?
1.1% of VBK's money is in holdings SPDW also owns. 1.1% of VBK's is in holdings SPDW also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 2,395 positions we hold weights for in SPDW and 532 in VBK.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPDW or VBK?
SPDW yields 2.92% while VBK yields 0.44%, so SPDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VBK better than SPDW?
SPDW has a lower expense ratio. SPDW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VBK over the full window. VBK is less concentrated, with 9.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.