SPGM vs TLTP
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF vs Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
SPGM has a lower expense ratio. SPGM delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPGM offers more diversification with 2,985 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPGM | TLTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $1.8B | $25M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 15.05% | |
| Holdings | 2,985 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +14.45% | -8.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.63% | -6.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.00% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.59% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 8.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -13.3% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Amplify ETFs | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Feb 27, 2012 | Oct 29, 2024 |
SPGM vs TLTP Performance
State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF (SPGM) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Amplify TLT US Treasury 12% Option Income ETF (TLTP) is a ETF from Amplify ETFs. Over the past year SPGM returned +25.63% while TLTP returned -6.89%. Year to date, SPGM is up 14.45% versus a loss of 8.91% for TLTP.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPGM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 8.7% for TLTP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for SPGM and -13.3% for TLTP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPGM charges 0.09% per year while TLTP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $39 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPGM currently yields 1.81% against 15.05% for TLTP.
Holdings Overlap
SPGM and TLTP share 0 holdings out of 2849 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPGM or TLTP?
SPGM has an expense ratio of 0.09% while TLTP charges 0.39%. SPGM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPGM or TLTP?
Over the past year SPGM returned +25.63% vs -6.89% for TLTP, so SPGM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), SPGM annualized +9.87% vs -5.03% for TLTP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPGM or TLTP?
SPGM has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 8.7% for TLTP. Worst drawdown: SPGM -34.0% vs TLTP -13.3%.
Should I hold both SPGM and TLTP?
SPGM and TLTP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPGM and TLTP?
SPGM and TLTP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2849 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPGM or TLTP?
SPGM yields 1.81% while TLTP yields 15.05%, so TLTP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.