SPY vs XMMO
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
Which is better, SPY or XMMO?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, XMMO over 3Y. XMMO is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | XMMO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09%Best | 0.35% |
| AUM | $804.7B | $7.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 0.63% |
| Holdings | 505 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +11.97%Best | +5.41% |
| 1Y Return | +16.40%Best | +10.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10% | +22.75%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88%Best | +12.32% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 29.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5%Best | -84.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $18,327Best | $17,877 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8% | 29.0%Best |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Mar 3, 2005 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 4, 1996 to Sep 14, 2026 (30.7 years).
SPY vs XMMO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 30.7 years both funds cover.
SPY vs XMMO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year SPY returned +16.40% while XMMO returned +10.29%. Year to date, SPY is up 11.97% versus a gain of 5.41% for XMMO.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +21.10% per year against +22.75% for XMMO; over five years the annualized figures are +12.88% and +12.32% respectively. Across the full 31-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.79% annualized vs +6.94%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.9% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -84.7% for XMMO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while XMMO charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $35 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 0.63% for XMMO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 504 holdings in SPY and 76 in XMMO, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 76 in XMMO, against full books of 505 and 77.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for XMMO that do not appear in our book for SPY (87.5% of the fund), and 497 for SPY that do not appear in XMMO (99.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SPY and XMMO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or XMMO?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XMMO charges 0.35%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPY or XMMO?
Over the past year SPY returned +16.40% vs +10.29% for XMMO, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (31 years), SPY annualized +8.79% vs +6.94% for XMMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPY or XMMO?
XMMO has been the more volatile fund at 29.9% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs XMMO -84.7%.
Should I hold both SPY and XMMO?
SPY and XMMO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or XMMO?
SPY yields 0.98% while XMMO yields 0.63%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XMMO better than SPY?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y, 5Y and the full window, XMMO over 3Y. XMMO is less concentrated, with 29.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.