SQLV vs VTI
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SQLV or VTI?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SQLV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SQLV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 627 | 3,542 |
| YTD Return | +24.28%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +27.26%Best | +12.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.16% | +21.44%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.29% | +10.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.5% | 16.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.8% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,566 | $16,722Best |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 13, 2017 to Nov 11, 2026 (9.3 years).
SQLV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.3 years both funds cover.
SQLV vs VTI Performance
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SQLV returned +27.26% while VTI returned +12.74%. Year to date, SQLV is up 24.28% versus a gain of 12.23% for VTI.
Over three years, SQLV compounded at +16.16% per year against +21.44% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.29% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.36% annualized vs +9.10%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SQLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 16.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.8% for SQLV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SQLV charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SQLV currently yields 1.01% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 34 holdings in SQLV and 3,464 in VTI, totalling 59.5% and 97.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in SQLV and 3,464 in VTI, against full books of 627 and 3,542.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SQLV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SQLV or VTI?
SQLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SQLV or VTI?
Over the past year SQLV returned +27.26% vs +12.74% for VTI, so SQLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SQLV annualized +9.10% vs +13.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SQLV or VTI?
SQLV has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 16.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SQLV -49.8% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SQLV and VTI?
SQLV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SQLV or VTI?
SQLV yields 1.01% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SQLV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SQLV led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.