SQLV vs VXUS
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SQLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SQLV | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $29M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.02% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 324 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +27.48% | +14.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +36.35% | +27.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.07% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.63% | +9.14% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SQLV vs VXUS Performance
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SQLV returned +36.35% while VXUS returned +27.24%. Year to date, SQLV is up 27.48% versus a gain of 14.07% for VXUS.
Over three years, SQLV compounded at +14.07% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.63% and +9.14% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SQLV has the edge at +9.67% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SQLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.8% for SQLV and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SQLV charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SQLV currently yields 1.02% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SQLV and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7873 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SQLV or VXUS?
SQLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SQLV or VXUS?
Over the past year SQLV returned +36.35% vs +27.24% for VXUS, so SQLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SQLV annualized +9.67% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SQLV or VXUS?
SQLV has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SQLV -49.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SQLV and VXUS?
SQLV and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SQLV and VXUS?
SQLV and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7873 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SQLV or VXUS?
SQLV yields 1.02% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.