SQLV vs VOO
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SQLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SQLV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $41M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.95% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 324 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +27.53% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.37% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.33% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.35% | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -49.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 12, 2017 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SQLV vs VOO Performance
Royce Quant Small Cap Quality Value ETF (SQLV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SQLV returned +32.37% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, SQLV is up 27.53% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, SQLV compounded at +15.33% per year against +22.06% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.35% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SQLV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.8% for SQLV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SQLV charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SQLV currently yields 0.95% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SQLV and VOO share 1 holdings out of 818 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SQLV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AOS | 0.24% | 0.01% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SQLV or VOO?
SQLV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SQLV or VOO?
Over the past year SQLV returned +32.37% vs +21.87% for VOO, so SQLV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), SQLV annualized +9.64% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SQLV or VOO?
SQLV has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SQLV -49.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SQLV and VOO?
SQLV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SQLV and VOO?
SQLV and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 818 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SQLV or VOO?
SQLV yields 0.95% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.