SSCP vs VTI

SSCP vs VTI

Which is better, SSCP or VTI?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%.

Lower Fees: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSSCPVTI
Expense Ratio0.79%0.03%Best
AUM$10M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings343,543
YTD Return+5.70%+11.06%Best
1Y Return-+15.41%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.48%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.52%
Top 10 Weight46.1%33.3%Best
Fund FamilySMART Wealth, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 11, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SSCP vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SSCP vs VTI Performance

SMART Small Cap ETF (SSCP) is an ETF from SMART Wealth, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SSCP is up 5.70% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SSCP charges 0.79% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSCP currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SSCP already in VTI76.0%

76.0% of SSCP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Most of SSCP is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

25 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in SSCP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 34 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SSCP (97.5% of the fund), and 4 for SSCP that do not appear in VTI (13.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SSCPWeight in VTIDifference
KALUKaiser Aluminum Corp5.06%0.00%5.06%
OOMAOoma Inc5.02%0.00%5.02%
MMMBMamamancini's Holdings Inc4.89%0.00%4.89%
PAYSPaysign Inc4.68%0.00%4.68%
NWPXNorthwest Pipe Co4.54%0.00%4.54%
SWBISmith & Wesson Brands Inc.4.32%0.00%4.32%
ATEXAnterix Inc4.17%0.00%4.17%
AMRKA Mark Precious Metals Inc Common Stock Usd.013.76%0.00%3.76%
PKEPark Aerospace Corp3.68%0.00%3.68%
RNGRRanger Energy Services Inc3.40%0.00%3.40%

76.0% of SSCP is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SSCPVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SSCP or VTI?

SSCP has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SSCP and VTI?

76.0% of SSCP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings SSCP also owns. They hold 25 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in SSCP and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SSCP or VTI?

SSCP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SSCP?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.