TACN vs VTI
T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TACN or VTI?
TACN costs less.
TACN has a lower expense ratio. TACN is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TACN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00%Best | 0.03% |
| AUM | $25M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 502 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +11.26% | +11.53%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +15.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.67% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.59% |
| Top 10 Weight | 14.3%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 10, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TACN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TACN vs VTI Performance
T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF (TACN) is an ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TACN is up 11.26% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TACN charges 0.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TACN currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.5% of TACN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings TACN also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
4 positions in common, counted across the 474 positions we hold weights for in TACN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 502 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TACN (97.4% of the fund), and 9 for TACN that do not appear in VTI (1.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TACN and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TACN or VTI?
TACN has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. TACN is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, TACN or VTI?
TACN yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TACN?
TACN has a lower expense ratio. TACN is less concentrated, with 14.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.