TAIL vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTAILVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.59%0.03%
AUM$149M$663.5B
Dividend Yield2.93%1.07%
Holdings253,543
YTD Return-9.98%+14.16%
1Y Return-11.58%+23.62%
3Y Return (annualized)-5.59%+21.43%
5Y Return (annualized)-9.21%+12.33%
Volatility (annualized)11.1%15.3%
Max Drawdown-53.6%-56.6%
Fund FamilyCambria Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionApr 5, 2017May 24, 2001

TAIL vs VTI Performance

Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is a ETF from Cambria Investment Management and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TAIL returned -11.58% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, TAIL is down 9.98% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.

Over three years, TAIL compounded at -5.59% per year against +21.43% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -9.21% and +12.33% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs -7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.1% for TAIL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.6% for TAIL and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.70. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TAIL charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TAIL currently yields 2.93% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

TAIL and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TAIL or VTI?

TAIL has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TAIL or VTI?

Over the past year TAIL returned -11.58% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), TAIL annualized -7.48% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TAIL or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.1% for TAIL. Worst drawdown: TAIL -53.6% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both TAIL and VTI?

TAIL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between TAIL and VTI?

TAIL and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, TAIL or VTI?

TAIL yields 2.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TAIL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.