TCV vs WBIF
Towle Small-Cap Value ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Which is better, TCV or WBIF?
TCV has been ahead.
TCV has a lower expense ratio. TCV led over 1Y and the full window. WBIF is less concentrated, with 23.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TCV | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $198M | $23M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.56% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 105 | 138 |
| YTD Return | +25.93%Best | +15.44% |
| 1Y Return | +26.14%Best | +14.64% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +3.64% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -12.2% | -7.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,218Best | $12,285 |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.6% | 23.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Towle | WBI Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 16, 2025 | Aug 25, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.3 years).
TCV vs WBIF growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
TCV vs WBIF Performance
Towle Small-Cap Value ETF (TCV) is an ETF from Towle and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is an ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year TCV returned +26.14% while WBIF returned +14.64%. Year to date, TCV is up 25.93% versus a gain of 15.44% for WBIF.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TCV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 12.2% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.2% for TCV and -7.0% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TCV charges 0.85% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $165 annually, a gap of $80 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TCV currently yields 0.56% against 0.00% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
3.0% of TCV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. 0.8% of WBIF's money is in holdings TCV also owns.
TCV and WBIF share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in TCV and 71 in WBIF, against full books of 105 and 138.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 67 positions for WBIF that do not appear in our book for TCV (94.0% of the fund), and 49 for TCV that do not appear in WBIF (96.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TCV | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PBFPbf Energy Inc | 3.01% | 0.85% | 2.16% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TCV and WBIF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TCV or WBIF?
TCV has an expense ratio of 0.85% while WBIF charges 1.65%. TCV is the cheaper option, by $80 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TCV or WBIF?
Over the past year TCV returned +26.14% vs +14.64% for WBIF, so TCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TCV annualized +23.94% vs +17.15% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TCV or WBIF?
TCV has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 12.2% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: TCV -12.2% vs WBIF -7.0%.
Should I hold both TCV and WBIF?
TCV and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TCV and WBIF?
3.0% of TCV's money is in holdings WBIF also owns. 0.8% of WBIF's is in holdings TCV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in TCV and 71 in WBIF.
Which pays a higher dividend, TCV or WBIF?
TCV yields 0.56% while WBIF yields 0.00%, so TCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WBIF better than TCV?
TCV has a lower expense ratio. TCV led over 1Y and the full window. WBIF is less concentrated, with 23.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 27.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.