VXUS vs WBIF
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | WBIF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 1.65% | |
| AUM | $158.1B | $24M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.59% | 0.06% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 70 | |
| YTD Return | +15.22% | +19.18% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.86% | +23.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.34% | +10.36% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.38% | +3.75% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 12.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -20.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Aug 25, 2014 |
VXUS vs WBIF Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year VXUS returned +26.86% while WBIF returned +23.52%. Year to date, VXUS is up 15.22% versus a gain of 19.18% for WBIF.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +20.34% per year against +10.36% for WBIF; over five years the annualized figures are +9.38% and +3.75% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.0% for WBIF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -20.3% for WBIF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while WBIF charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $165 annually, a gap of $160 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.59% against 0.06% for WBIF.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and WBIF share 1 holdings out of 7937 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VXUS | Weight in WBIF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9987:SH | 0.03% | 2.25% | 2.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or WBIF?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while WBIF charges 1.65%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $160 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or WBIF?
Over the past year VXUS returned +26.86% vs +23.52% for WBIF, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VXUS annualized +4.89% vs +4.28% for WBIF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or WBIF?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.0% for WBIF. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs WBIF -20.3%.
Should I hold both VXUS and WBIF?
VXUS and WBIF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and WBIF?
VXUS and WBIF share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7937 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or WBIF?
VXUS yields 2.59% while WBIF yields 0.06%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.