TPFC vs VYM

TPFC vs VYM

Which is better, TPFC or VYM?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.4%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTPFCVYM
Expense Ratio0.59%0.04%Best
AUM$43M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.16%2.22%
Holdings51613
YTD Return+11.14%+11.35%Best
1Y Return-+15.34%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.22%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.30%
Top 10 Weight43.4%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyTimothy PlanVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Value
InceptionMay 5, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

TPFC vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

TPFC vs VYM Performance

Timothy Plan Free Cash Flow ETF (TPFC) is an ETF from Timothy Plan and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TPFC is up 11.14% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TPFC charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TPFC currently yields 0.16% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

TPFC already in VYM49.6%
VYM already in TPFC3.3%

49.6% of TPFC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.3% of VYM's money is in holdings TPFC also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in TPFC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 510 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for TPFC (93.8% of the fund), and 29 for TPFC that do not appear in VYM (46.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TPFCWeight in VYMDifference
CTSHCognizant Technology Solutions Corp. Class A5.21%0.11%5.10%
NEMNewmont Corp Common4.71%0.41%4.30%
PSXPhillips 664.77%0.34%4.43%
DVNDevon Energy Corporation4.12%0.21%3.91%
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.3.95%0.16%3.79%
PRPermian Resource3.39%0.07%3.32%
EXEExpand Energy Corp3.14%0.09%3.05%
GDGeneral Dynamics Corp.2.70%0.40%2.30%
SLBSchlumberger Nv.2.62%0.30%2.32%
ZTSZoetis Inc, Class A2.75%0.13%2.62%

49.6% of TPFC is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

TPFCVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TPFC or VYM?

TPFC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between TPFC and VYM?

49.6% of TPFC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.3% of VYM's is in holdings TPFC also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in TPFC and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, TPFC or VYM?

TPFC yields 0.16% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than TPFC?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.