TPOR vs VTI
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. TPOR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TPOR | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +35.52% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +49.40% | +20.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.10% | +21.42% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.28% | +12.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -87.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | May 3, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
TPOR vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily Transportation Bull 3X ETF (TPOR) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TPOR returned +49.40% while VTI returned +20.29%. Year to date, TPOR is up 35.52% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, TPOR compounded at +14.10% per year against +21.42% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.28% and +12.00% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.08% annualized vs +6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TPOR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -87.8% for TPOR and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TPOR charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TPOR currently yields 0.57% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TPOR and VTI share 29 holdings out of 2805 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TPOR or VTI?
TPOR has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TPOR or VTI?
Over the past year TPOR returned +49.40% vs +20.29% for VTI, so TPOR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), TPOR annualized +6.30% vs +8.08% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TPOR or VTI?
TPOR has been the more volatile fund at 67.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TPOR -87.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TPOR and VTI?
TPOR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TPOR and VTI?
TPOR and VTI share 29 common holdings with a 1.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2805 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TPOR or VTI?
TPOR yields 0.57% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.