TSCV vs VOO
Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, TSCV or VOO?
Small Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TSCV led over 1Y. TSCV is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TSCV | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $181M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 61 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +16.79%Best | +13.37% |
| 1Y Return | - | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Top 10 Weight | 24.8%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Thrivent Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
TSCV vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
TSCV vs VOO Performance
Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) is an ETF from Thrivent Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, TSCV is up 16.79% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TSCV charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSCV currently yields 0.23% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of TSCV's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
TSCV and VOO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 52 days apart, TSCV as of Aug 21, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in TSCV and 505 in VOO, against full books of 61 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for TSCV (99.5% of the fund), and 54 for TSCV that do not appear in VOO (91.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TSCV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WYNNWynn Resorts Ltd. | 1.56% | 0.01% | 1.55% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of TSCV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TSCV or VOO?
TSCV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between TSCV and VOO?
1.6% of TSCV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.0% of VOO's is in holdings TSCV also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 59 positions we hold weights for in TSCV and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, TSCV or VOO?
TSCV yields 0.23% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than TSCV?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. TSCV led over 1Y. TSCV is less concentrated, with 24.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.