QQQ vs TSCV
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF
Which is better, QQQ or TSCV?
Large Cap Growth against Small Cap Value.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TSCV led over 1Y. TSCV is less concentrated, with 25.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | TSCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $178M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 107 | 61 |
| YTD Return | +17.95%Best | +11.88% |
| 1Y Return | +21.77% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.63% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.24% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 25.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Thrivent Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Small Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Nov 17, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
QQQ vs TSCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs TSCV Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV) is an ETF from Thrivent Funds. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.95% versus a gain of 11.88% for TSCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while TSCV charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $60 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.24% for TSCV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 58 in TSCV, totalling 99.9% and 100.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 58 in TSCV, against full books of 107 and 61.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 54 positions for TSCV that do not appear in our book for QQQ (91.1% of the fund), and 96 for QQQ that do not appear in TSCV (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and TSCV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or TSCV?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while TSCV charges 0.60%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or TSCV?
QQQ yields 0.44% while TSCV yields 0.24%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TSCV better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. TSCV led over 1Y. TSCV is less concentrated, with 25.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.