UBOT vs VTI
Direxion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UBOT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.32% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $27M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.14% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -13.04% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.23% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.83% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.94% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 60.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -86.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 19, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
UBOT vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 2X ETF (UBOT) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UBOT returned +3.23% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, UBOT is down 13.04% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, UBOT compounded at +9.83% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -10.94% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.1% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -86.1% for UBOT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UBOT charges 1.32% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $132 vs $3 annually, a gap of $129 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UBOT currently yields 1.14% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
UBOT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UBOT or VTI?
UBOT has an expense ratio of 1.32% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $129 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UBOT or VTI?
Over the past year UBOT returned +3.23% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), UBOT annualized -8.30% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UBOT or VTI?
UBOT has been the more volatile fund at 60.1% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UBOT -86.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both UBOT and VTI?
UBOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UBOT and VTI?
UBOT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UBOT or VTI?
UBOT yields 1.14% while VTI yields 1.07%, so UBOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.