UCOP vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUCOPVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%
AUM$4M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.13%1.07%
Holdings43,543
YTD Return+9.70%+14.96%
1Y Return-+22.39%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.51%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)-15.4%
Max Drawdown-21.8%-56.6%
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
InceptionApr 20, 2026May 24, 2001

UCOP vs VTI Performance

ProShares Ultra Copper K-1 Free ETF (UCOP) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, UCOP is up 9.70% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for UCOP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UCOP charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UCOP currently yields 0.13% against 1.07% for VTI.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UCOP or VTI?

UCOP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.

Which pays a higher dividend, UCOP or VTI?

UCOP yields 0.13% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.