UCOP vs VOO
ProShares Ultra Copper K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UCOP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.12% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.43% | +12.87% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.15% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.76% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -21.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UCOP vs VOO Performance
ProShares Ultra Copper K-1 Free ETF (UCOP) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, UCOP is up 9.43% versus a gain of 12.87% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -21.8% for UCOP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UCOP charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UCOP currently yields 0.12% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UCOP or VOO?
UCOP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, UCOP or VOO?
UCOP yields 0.12% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.