UFEB vs ZNOV
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November
Which is better, UFEB or ZNOV?
UFEB has been ahead.
UFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UFEB | ZNOV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Tie | 0.79%Tie |
| AUM | $162M | $159M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 12 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +8.00%Best | +5.62% |
| 1Y Return | +9.79%Best | +6.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.36% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 2.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.7% | -3.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,144Best | $11,291 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Innovator ETFs Trust |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Jan 31, 2020 | Nov 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Nov 11, 2026 (2 years).
UFEB vs ZNOV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
UFEB vs ZNOV Performance
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - February (UFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year UFEB returned +9.79% while ZNOV returned +6.08%. Year to date, UFEB is up 8.00% versus a gain of 5.62% for ZNOV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UFEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.4% compared with 2.7% for ZNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.7% for UFEB and -3.3% for ZNOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UFEB charges 0.79% per year while ZNOV charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, UFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZNOV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UFEB and ZNOV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UFEB or ZNOV?
UFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZNOV charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
Which performed better, UFEB or ZNOV?
Over the past year UFEB returned +9.79% vs +6.08% for ZNOV, so UFEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), UFEB annualized +10.20% vs +6.26% for ZNOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UFEB or ZNOV?
UFEB has been the more volatile fund at 5.4% annualized versus 2.7% for ZNOV. Worst drawdown: UFEB -8.7% vs ZNOV -3.3%.
Should I hold both UFEB and ZNOV?
UFEB and ZNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, UFEB or ZNOV?
UFEB yields 0.00% while ZNOV yields 0.00%, so ZNOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZNOV better than UFEB?
UFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.