UMAY vs VOO
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UMAY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $139M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +5.63% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.92% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.22% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.45% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.3% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 30, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
UMAY vs VOO Performance
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - May (UMAY) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UMAY returned +8.92% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, UMAY is up 5.63% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, UMAY compounded at +11.22% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +6.45% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +6.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 6.3% for UMAY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for UMAY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UMAY charges 0.79% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UMAY currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
UMAY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UMAY or VOO?
UMAY has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UMAY or VOO?
Over the past year UMAY returned +8.92% vs +21.63% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), UMAY annualized +6.86% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UMAY or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 6.3% for UMAY. Worst drawdown: UMAY -12.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both UMAY and VOO?
UMAY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UMAY and VOO?
UMAY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UMAY or VOO?
UMAY yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.