UMMA vs VXUS
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. UMMA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UMMA | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $280M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 102 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +22.92% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +43.80% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.75% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Wahed Invest | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 6, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UMMA vs VXUS Performance
Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) is a ETF from Wahed Invest and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UMMA returned +43.80% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, UMMA is up 22.92% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, UMMA compounded at +20.75% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, UMMA has the edge at +10.06% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UMMA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.2% for UMMA and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UMMA charges 0.65% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $5 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UMMA currently yields 0.92% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UMMA and VXUS share 63 holdings out of 7890 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UMMA or VXUS?
UMMA has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UMMA or VXUS?
Over the past year UMMA returned +43.80% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so UMMA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), UMMA annualized +10.06% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UMMA or VXUS?
UMMA has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: UMMA -34.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UMMA and VXUS?
UMMA and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between UMMA and VXUS?
UMMA and VXUS share 63 common holdings with a 13.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7890 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UMMA or VXUS?
UMMA yields 0.92% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.