UPAL vs VYM
ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UPAL | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $3M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -32.30% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -48.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 20, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
UPAL vs VYM Performance
ProShares Ultra Palladium K-1 Free ETF (UPAL) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, UPAL is down 32.30% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -48.2% for UPAL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UPAL charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UPAL currently yields 0.28% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UPAL or VYM?
UPAL has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, UPAL or VYM?
UPAL yields 0.28% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.