UPV vs VTI
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, UPV or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. UPV led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UPV | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.12% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.53% | +11.06%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.67%Best | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.43%Best | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.78% | +11.52%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 35.9% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,544 | $17,249Best |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 27, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 30, 2010 to Sep 16, 2026 (16.4 years).
UPV vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.4 years both funds cover.
UPV vs VTI Performance
ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe (UPV) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UPV returned +20.67% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, UPV is up 6.53% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Over three years, UPV compounded at +26.43% per year against +20.48% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.78% and +11.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.19% annualized vs +7.76%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UPV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.9% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for UPV and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UPV charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UPV currently yields 2.12% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in UPV and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 53.2% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in UPV and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 7 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UPV and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UPV or VTI?
UPV has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UPV or VTI?
Over the past year UPV returned +20.67% vs +15.41% for VTI, so UPV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), UPV annualized +7.76% vs +12.19% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UPV or VTI?
UPV has been the more volatile fund at 35.9% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UPV -68.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both UPV and VTI?
UPV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, UPV or VTI?
UPV yields 2.12% while VTI yields 1.03%, so UPV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than UPV?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. UPV led over 1Y and 3Y, VTI over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.