UX vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTIMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUXVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%
AUM$5M$663.5B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.07%
Holdings73,543
YTD Return-4.28%+14.22%
1Y Return+13.07%+22.19%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.23%
Volatility (annualized)31.7%15.3%
Max Drawdown-26.1%-56.6%
Fund FamilyRoundhill InvestmentsVanguard (US)
CategoryCommodityEquity
InceptionJan 29, 2025May 24, 2001

UX vs VTI Performance

Roundhill Uranium ETF (UX) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UX returned +13.07% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, UX is down 4.28% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.1% for UX and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UX charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UX currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

UX and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UX or VTI?

UX has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.

Which performed better, UX or VTI?

Over the past year UX returned +13.07% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), UX annualized +7.18% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, UX or VTI?

UX has been the more volatile fund at 31.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UX -26.1% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both UX and VTI?

UX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between UX and VTI?

UX and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, UX or VTI?

UX yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.