UXJL vs VOO

UXJL vs VOO

Which is better, UXJL or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns (1Y): VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUXJLVOO
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%Best
AUM$6M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings8509
YTD Return+12.55%Best+12.50%
1Y Return+16.83%+17.58%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.95%
Volatility (annualized)14.4%12.4%Best
Max Drawdown-10.3%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$12,207Tie$12,207Tie
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 18, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 21, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.1 years).

UXJL vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.

UXJL vs VOO Performance

FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UXJL returned +16.83% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, UXJL is up 12.55% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UXJL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.4% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.3% for UXJL and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UXJL charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UXJL currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UXJL and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UXJLVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UXJL or VOO?

UXJL has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UXJL or VOO?

Over the past year UXJL returned +16.83% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), UXJL annualized +19.88% vs +19.88% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UXJL or VOO?

UXJL has been the more volatile fund at 14.4% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UXJL -10.3% vs VOO -8.9%.

Should I hold both UXJL and VOO?

UXJL and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UXJL or VOO?

UXJL yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than UXJL?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.