VCSH vs XLK
Vanguard Short Term Corporate Bond ETF vs State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
Which is better, VCSH or XLK?
Short Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.
VCSH has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VCSH | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.08% |
| AUM | $52.0B | $119.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.47% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 3,023 | 77 |
| YTD Return | +0.28% | +27.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +1.45% | +35.16%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.31% | +30.32%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.17% | +19.31%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.9%Best | -33.6% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,133 | $24,176Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Short Term Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2009 | Dec 16, 1998 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2009 to Sep 15, 2026 (16.8 years).
VCSH vs XLK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VCSH vs XLK Performance
Vanguard Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VCSH returned +1.45% while XLK returned +35.16%. Year to date, VCSH is up 0.28% versus a gain of 27.64% for XLK.
Over three years, VCSH compounded at +5.31% per year against +30.32% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are +2.17% and +19.31% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, XLK has the edge at +18.50% annualized vs +1.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 2.6% for VCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.9% for VCSH and -33.6% for XLK. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VCSH charges 0.03% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VCSH currently yields 4.47% against 0.43% for XLK.
Holdings Overlap
At least 14.6% of XLK's money is in holdings VCSH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VCSH, our book for it covers 62.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
XLK and VCSH share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 1,545 positions we hold weights for in VCSH and 74 in XLK, against full books of 3,023 and 77.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VCSH and XLK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VCSH or XLK?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLK charges 0.08%. VCSH is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VCSH or XLK?
Over the past year VCSH returned +1.45% vs +35.16% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VCSH annualized +1.25% vs +18.50% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VCSH or XLK?
XLK has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 2.6% for VCSH. Worst drawdown: VCSH -12.9% vs XLK -33.6%.
Should I hold both VCSH and XLK?
VCSH and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VCSH and XLK?
At least 14.6% of XLK's money is in holdings VCSH also owns. Our book for VCSH is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 1,545 positions we hold weights for in VCSH and 74 in XLK.
Which pays a higher dividend, VCSH or XLK?
VCSH yields 4.47% while XLK yields 0.43%, so VCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XLK better than VCSH?
VCSH has a lower expense ratio. XLK led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.