VCSH vs VTI
Vanguard Short Term Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VCSH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $52.0B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.46% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 3,023 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.13% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.19% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.74% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.39% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 2.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -12.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2009 | May 24, 2001 |
VCSH vs VTI Performance
Vanguard Short Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VCSH returned +3.19% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, VCSH is up 1.13% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, VCSH compounded at +5.74% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.39% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 2.6% for VCSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.9% for VCSH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VCSH charges 0.03% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VCSH currently yields 4.46% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VCSH or VTI?
VCSH has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTI charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VCSH or VTI?
Over the past year VCSH returned +3.19% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VCSH annualized +1.31% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VCSH or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 2.6% for VCSH. Worst drawdown: VCSH -12.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both VCSH and VTI?
VCSH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VCSH and VTI?
VCSH and VTI share 2 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3342 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VCSH or VTI?
VCSH yields 4.46% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.