VNAM vs VYM
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNAM | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $33M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -4.24% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.54% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.15% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
VNAM vs VYM Performance
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNAM returned +10.54% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, VNAM is down 4.24% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, VNAM compounded at +9.15% per year against +18.54% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.10% annualized vs -0.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VNAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for VNAM and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNAM charges 0.51% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $4 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNAM currently yields 0.48% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
VNAM and VYM share 0 holdings out of 622 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNAM or VYM?
VNAM has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VNAM or VYM?
Over the past year VNAM returned +10.54% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VNAM annualized -0.90% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VNAM or VYM?
VNAM has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VNAM -52.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both VNAM and VYM?
VNAM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VNAM and VYM?
VNAM and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 622 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNAM or VYM?
VNAM yields 0.48% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.