VNAM vs VOO
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNAM | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $33M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.64% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.94% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.99% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
VNAM vs VOO Performance
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNAM returned +10.94% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, VNAM is down 4.64% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, VNAM compounded at +8.99% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -0.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VNAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for VNAM and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNAM charges 0.51% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNAM currently yields 0.48% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
VNAM and VOO share 0 holdings out of 569 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNAM or VOO?
VNAM has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VNAM or VOO?
Over the past year VNAM returned +10.94% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VNAM annualized -0.99% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VNAM or VOO?
VNAM has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VNAM -52.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VNAM and VOO?
VNAM and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VNAM and VOO?
VNAM and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 569 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNAM or VOO?
VNAM yields 0.48% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.