VNAM vs VTI
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VNAM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $35M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 72 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -5.41% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.34% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.83% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 7, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
VNAM vs VTI Performance
Global X MSCI Vietnam ETF (VNAM) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VNAM returned +7.34% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, VNAM is down 5.41% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, VNAM compounded at +10.83% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs -1.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VNAM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.8% for VNAM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VNAM charges 0.51% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VNAM currently yields 0.52% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
VNAM and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2846 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VNAM or VTI?
VNAM has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VNAM or VTI?
Over the past year VNAM returned +7.34% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VNAM annualized -1.15% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VNAM or VTI?
VNAM has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VNAM -52.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both VNAM and VTI?
VNAM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VNAM and VTI?
VNAM and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 2.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2846 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VNAM or VTI?
VNAM yields 0.52% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.