VONG vs VTIP
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
Quick Verdict
VTIP has a lower expense ratio. VONG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VONG offers more diversification with 386 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VONG | VTIP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $44.9B | $19.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.54% | 3.60% | |
| Holdings | 390 | 27 | |
| YTD Return | +5.53% | +1.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.10% | +2.97% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.81% | +5.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.79% | +3.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 2.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -7.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2010 | Oct 12, 2012 |
VONG vs VTIP Performance
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VONG returned +12.10% while VTIP returned +2.97%. Year to date, VONG is up 5.53% versus a gain of 1.89% for VTIP.
Over three years, VONG compounded at +22.81% per year against +5.46% for VTIP; over five years the annualized figures are +12.79% and +3.38% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.77% annualized vs +1.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VONG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 2.4% for VTIP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for VONG and -7.1% for VTIP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VONG charges 0.06% per year while VTIP charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VONG currently yields 0.54% against 3.60% for VTIP.
Holdings Overlap
VONG and VTIP share 0 holdings out of 409 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VONG or VTIP?
VONG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTIP charges 0.03%. VTIP is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VONG or VTIP?
Over the past year VONG returned +12.10% vs +2.97% for VTIP, so VONG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), VONG annualized +15.77% vs +1.58% for VTIP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VONG or VTIP?
VONG has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 2.4% for VTIP. Worst drawdown: VONG -32.7% vs VTIP -7.1%.
Should I hold both VONG and VTIP?
VONG and VTIP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VONG and VTIP?
VONG and VTIP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 409 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VONG or VTIP?
VONG yields 0.54% while VTIP yields 3.60%, so VTIP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.