VONG vs VXF
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF vs Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VXF has a lower expense ratio. VXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXF offers more diversification with 3,376 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VONG | VXF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $51.6B | $30.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.03% | |
| Holdings | 373 | 3,376 | |
| YTD Return | +4.01% | +16.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.19% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.47% | +20.39% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +7.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 18.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -32.7% | -59.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2010 | Dec 27, 2001 |
VONG vs VXF Performance
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VONG returned +12.19% while VXF returned +24.93%. Year to date, VONG is up 4.01% versus a gain of 16.66% for VXF.
Over three years, VONG compounded at +22.47% per year against +20.39% for VXF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.11% and +7.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VONG has the edge at +15.63% annualized vs +9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.9% for VONG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.7% for VONG and -59.4% for VXF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VONG charges 0.06% per year while VXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VONG currently yields 0.48% against 1.03% for VXF.
Holdings Overlap
VONG and VXF share 176 holdings out of 3489 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VONG or VXF?
VONG has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VXF charges 0.05%. VXF is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VONG or VXF?
Over the past year VONG returned +12.19% vs +24.93% for VXF, so VXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VONG annualized +15.63% vs +9.04% for VXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VONG or VXF?
VXF has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.9% for VONG. Worst drawdown: VONG -32.7% vs VXF -59.4%.
Should I hold both VONG and VXF?
VONG and VXF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VONG and VXF?
VONG and VXF share 176 common holdings with a 5.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3489 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VONG or VXF?
VONG yields 0.48% while VXF yields 1.03%, so VXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.