VOO vs VWID
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VWID delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | VWID | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $13M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.68% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 158 | |
| YTD Return | +13.79% | +7.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.01% | +49.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.78% | +18.67% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.39% | +11.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 25.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -52.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Virtus Investment Partners | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Oct 10, 2017 |
VOO vs VWID Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Virtus WMC International Dividend ETF (VWID) is a ETF from Virtus Investment Partners. Over the past year VOO returned +23.01% while VWID returned +49.28%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.79% versus a gain of 7.80% for VWID.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.78% per year against +18.67% for VWID; over five years the annualized figures are +13.39% and +11.86% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +10.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VWID has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -52.4% for VWID. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while VWID charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 3.68% for VWID.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and VWID share 0 holdings out of 647 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or VWID?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VWID charges 0.49%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or VWID?
Over the past year VOO returned +23.01% vs +49.28% for VWID, so VWID leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), VOO annualized +13.57% vs +10.15% for VWID. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or VWID?
VWID has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs VWID -52.4%.
Should I hold both VOO and VWID?
VOO and VWID have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and VWID?
VOO and VWID share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 647 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or VWID?
VOO yields 1.09% while VWID yields 3.68%, so VWID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.