VOO vs WARP
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs VanEck Space ETF
Which is better, VOO or WARP?
Large Cap Blend against All Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WARP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.50% |
| AUM | $997.4B | $32M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 509 | 22 |
| YTD Return | +12.37%Best | -19.51% |
| 1Y Return | +16.61% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.37% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.49% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.6%Best | 75.1% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | All Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | May 6, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VOO vs WARP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VOO vs WARP Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and VanEck Space ETF (WARP) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, VOO is up 12.37% versus a loss of 19.51% for WARP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WARP charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $50 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for WARP.
Holdings Overlap
4.9% of WARP's money is in holdings VOO also owns.
WARP and VOO share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 21 in WARP, against full books of 509 and 22.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 12 positions for WARP that do not appear in our book for VOO (75.4% of the fund), and 486 for VOO that do not appear in WARP (99.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in WARP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SATS'echostar Communications Corp. Class 'a'' | 0.02% | 4.92% | 4.90% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VOO and WARP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WARP?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WARP charges 0.50%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WARP?
4.9% of WARP's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 4.9% of WARP's is in holdings VOO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 494 positions we hold weights for in VOO and 21 in WARP.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WARP?
VOO yields 1.04% while WARP yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WARP better than VOO?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 37.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 75.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.