VOO vs WEAT

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOWEATWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%1.00%
AUM$979.0B$294M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.00%
Holdings50929
YTD Return+13.44%+18.55%
1Y Return+22.62%+10.54%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.47%-9.10%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.27%-7.89%
Volatility (annualized)14.1%23.0%
Max Drawdown-34.3%-84.3%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Teucrium
CategoryEquityCommodity
InceptionSep 7, 2010Sep 19, 2011

VOO vs WEAT Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Teucrium Wheat Fund ETF (WEAT) is a ETF from Teucrium. Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% while WEAT returned +10.54%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.44% versus a gain of 18.55% for WEAT.

Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.47% per year against -9.10% for WEAT; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and -7.89% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.55% annualized vs -10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

WEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -84.3% for WEAT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while WEAT charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $100 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for WEAT.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

VOO and WEAT share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or WEAT?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WEAT charges 1.00%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VOO or WEAT?

Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% vs +10.54% for WEAT, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), VOO annualized +13.55% vs -10.46% for WEAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VOO or WEAT?

WEAT has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WEAT -84.3%.

Should I hold both VOO and WEAT?

VOO and WEAT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WEAT?

VOO and WEAT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WEAT?

VOO yields 1.09% while WEAT yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.